Review: Edge of Tomorrow

Over at Strange Horizons, I review the Tom Cruise time travel movie Edge of Tomorrow, a film that I thought was just terrible but which seems to be getting good reviews from all other quarters, which I honestly find quite baffling.  It's starting to feel a little like being the only reviewer not blown away by Looper, but where Looper had some genuine strong points (not least, recognizing that just because the male lead wants Emily Blunt to save him doesn't mean that's all she's got going on in her life, a fact of which Edge of Tomorrow remains sadly ignorant), Edge of Tomorrow is merely a competently made action film that squanders everything potentially interesting or thought-provoking about its premise and characters.

Incidentally, between watching the film and writing my review I decided to read the original novel, All You Need Is Kill by Hiroshi Sakurazaka, just to get a sense of how big the gap between the two is (answer: not great in general but pretty huge in certain points).  It's not a great book by any stretch, but it's a quick read, and a hell of a lot more interesting than the movie in its handling of its premise, its world, and its characters (in particular, the relationship between the male and female leads is a lot more equitable, though the other female characters are often problematic).  If anything good comes out of Edge of Tomorrow it will be to call attention to Haikasoru and its project to bring Japanese SF to Anglophone audiences, and All You Need Is Kill is a good place to start.

(Note: the comments on Strange Horizons reviews are currently not working.  If you'd like to comment on the review, please do it here until we resolve the issue.)

Comments

RF said…
The concept of a group of aliens who have supreme powers of mimicry and who can think of nothing better to do with them than essentially reenact the Second World War is really kind of sweet. It's like what they're actually trying to do is cheer us up by letting us participate in our most obsessed-over nostalgic fantasy, and they just don't understand that the resulting deaths are real.

Also, how strange to encounter SF that plays "bug-brained aliens, uncomplicated evil, you have to kill the queen" straight. Orson Scott Card still has what's left of this trope's head tied to his shield. It's hard to think of a deader SF idea that isn't being played as satirically retro.
June 06, 2014 9:58 PM
Abigail Nussbaum said…
The concept of a group of aliens who have supreme powers of mimicry and who can think of nothing better to do with them than essentially reenact the Second World War is really kind of sweet.

Yes, quite. It's really quite disorienting - you start the film with news footage of an alien invasion, and then suddenly it's "the aliens have conquered Germany and France!" Um, what? That it's said with such a straight face - as if no one in the film (which appears to take place in the not at all distant future) recognizes the historical parallels - is what truly makes it art.

The book, by the way, actually does give a fairly compelling explanation of who the aliens are and what they want, and a semi-plausible justification for its choice to plump for the mindless evil approach (the aliens are actually semi-organic terraforming robots created by a distant expansionist alien civilization). It actually didn't have to do this - it's so locked into its protagonist's head, and its stakes are so much lower (no one in the book is going to save the world in the immediate future) that you don't find yourself wondering about the aliens that much. But Sakurazaka takes the time to invent a coherent explanation where the film plumps for inanities.
June 06, 2014 10:43 PM
Abigail Nussbaum said…
That's a persuasive reading (certainly more persuasive than the argument that the film has a compelling plot and characters, per SLW's review, which I honestly just don't get). I rather doubt that it's the intended one - I certainly wouldn't have thought to describe Edge of Tomorrow as humorous; it's in fact one of the more po-faced films I've seen in some time, and that extends to what feels to me like an obvious expectation that the audience will be invested in Cage's antics (and in the future of the film's world) from the first moment.
June 09, 2014 12:56 PM
Anonymous said…
The movie just turned up on Netflix. Having watched it, I would like to second the opinion that much of it comes across as a somewhat dark, deadpan comedy. Not always a successful one, I'll grant you, but it got a few amused-eyeroll moments from me at the very least. Rita's matter-of-factly way of shooting Cage in the head whenever she decides that the iteration is beyond saving, in complete disregard for his obvious discomfort with it, was kind of hilarious, for one.

But yeah, the book was better. It's less in love with its protagonist, for a start.
April 20, 2015 10:14 PM

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The 2023 Hugo Awards: Somehow, It Got Worse

The last month has been a busy one in Hugo and Worldcon fandom. After the shock of the much-belated 2023 nominating stats, and their revelation of serious irregularities in the compilation of the award's ballot, there was a great ferment of conversation and action. Mainstream publications have caught wind of the scandal and publicized it far and wide . Turnover in the few permanent committees that oversee the Hugo trademark and intellectual property has been high . The poor folks at the upcoming Glasgow Worldcon have been scrambling to respond to the evolving situation and to distance themselves from the previous committee—including, most recently, making a laconic announcement that they would refuse any of Chengdu's passalong funds, the budgetary surplus that is traditionally bequeathed from one Worldcon to the next. And stats nerds—of which this community is, unsurprisingly, blessed with a surfeit—have been furiously crunching the nominations numbers and EPH calculations...
Read more

The 2023 Hugo Awards: Now With an Asterisk

It's been a while since we've had one of these dramas. On Saturday, the nominating stats for the 2023 Hugo awards, which were announced in Chengdu, China in October 2023, were released to the public . There was a great deal of anticipation for these numbers, in no small part because of their much-delayed release. Though the WSFS constitution permits Hugo administrators to wait as long as 90 days before releasing the voting and nominating stats, most Hugo teams have them ready to go within minutes of the ceremony's conclusion. Chengdu, in contrast, waited the full allotted period, and even went a little bit over (the voting stats were released separately in December). Once the stats were released, it quickly became clear why the Chengdu Hugo team were hesitant to make them public. There are any number of irregularities and questionable choices in this document that suggest everything from erratic voter behavior, to incompetent collation and calculation of the nomination rank...
Read more

Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga

The first thing that must be said about this movie is that it should not work. It's a prequel to one of the most mind-blowing, groundbreaking, and just plain revolutionary action movies of the 21st century—and prequels are a bad idea in most cases, but all the more so when the character they revolve around has already given you their entire backstory in their original introduction, which is also the final, culminating act of their character arc. (To put it another way, if you had asked me, nine years ago, which character I thought offered more fertile ground for prequel storytelling, Imperator Furiosa or Han Solo, I would have picked Han without a moment's hesitation, and I don't even like Han that much.) And it's a follow-up to a movie whose chief virtue lies in its conciseness—in being a single, drawn-out, pulse-pounding, increasingly deranged car chase. Which means you can either try to repeat that accomplishment, which will inevitably feel a bit old hat; or you can ...
Read more